Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Fire And Fury: Chapter 1 - Election Day

Fire And Fury

Previous Post > Prologue: Ailes And Bannon

In  the  afternoon   of  November   8,  2016,  Kellyanne   Conway—Donald Trump’s campaign manager and a central, indeed starring, personality of Trumpworld—settled  into her glass office at Trump Tower. Right up until the last weeks of the race, the Trump campaign headquarters had remained a listless place. All that seemed to distinguish it from a corporate back office were a few posters with right-wing slogans.

Conway now was in a remarkably buoyant mood considering she was about to experience a resounding if not cataclysmic defeat. Donald Trump would lose the election—of this she was sure—but he would quite possibly hold the defeat to under 6 points. That was a substantial victory. As for the looming defeat itself, she shrugged it off: it was Reince Priebus’s fault, not hers.

She had spent a good part of the day calling friends and allies in the political world and blaming Priebus. Now she briefed some of the television producers and  anchors  with  whom  she’d  built  strong  relationships—and   with  whom, actively interviewing in the last few weeks, she was hoping to land a permanent on-air job after the election. She’d carefully courted many of them since joining the  Trump  campaign  in  mid-August and  becoming the  campaign’s reliably combative voice and, with her spasmodic smiles and strange combination of woundedness and imperturbability, peculiarly telegenic face.

Beyond all of the other horrible blunders of the campaign, the real problem, she  said,  was  the  devil  they  couldn’t  control:  the  Republican  National Committee, which was run by Priebus, his sidekick, thirty-two-year-old Katie Walsh, and their flack, Sean Spicer. Instead of being all in, the RNC, ultimately the tool of the Republican establishment,  had been hedging its bets ever since Trump won the nomination in early summer. When Trump needed the push, the push just wasn’t there.

That was the first part of Conway’s  spin. The other part was that despite everything,  the campaign  had really  clawed  its way  back  from  the abyss.  A severely underresourced team with, practically speaking, the worst candidate in modern political history—Conway offered either an eye-rolling pantomime whenever  Trump’s  name  was mentioned,  or a dead  stare—had  actually  done extraordinarily  well.  Conway,  who  had  never  been  involved  in  a  national campaign, and who, before Trump, ran a small-time, down-ballot polling firm, understood full well that, post-campaign, she would now be one of the leading conservative voices on cable news.

In fact, one of the Trump campaign pollsters, John McLaughlin, had begun to suggest  within  the  past  week  or so that  some  key  state  numbers,  heretofore dismal, might actually be changing to Trump’s advantage. But neither Conway nor Trump himself nor his son-in-law Jared Kushner—the effective head of the campaign,  or the designated  family monitor of it—wavered  in their certainty: their unexpected adventure would soon be over.

Download Free Magazines



Only Steve Bannon, in his odd-man view, insisted the numbers would break in their  favor.  But  this  being  Bannon’s  view—crazy  Steve—it  was  quite  the opposite of being a reassuring one.

Almost everybody in the campaign, still an extremely small outfit, thought of themselves as a clear-eyed team, as realistic about their prospects as perhaps any in politics. The unspoken agreement among them: not only would Donald Trump not be president, he should probably not be.

Conveniently, the former conviction meant nobody had to deal with the latter issue.

As the campaign came to an end, Trump himself was sanguine. He had survived the release of the Billy Bush tape when, in the uproar that followed, the RNC had had the gall to pressure him to quit the race. FBI director James Comey, having bizarrely hung Hillary out to dry by saying he was reopening the investigation into her emails eleven days before the election, had helped avert a total Clinton landslide.

“I can be the most famous man in the world,” Trump told his on-again, off-again aide Sam Nunberg at the outset of the campaign.

“But do you want to be president?” Nunberg asked (a qualitatively different question than the usual existential candidate test: “Why do you want to be president?”). Nunberg did not get an answer.

The point was, there didn’t need to be an answer because he wasn’t going to be president.
Trump’s longtime friend Roger Ailes liked to say that if you wanted a career in television,  first  run  for  president.  Now  Trump,  encouraged  by  Ailes,  was floating rumors about a Trump network. It was a great future.

He would come out of this campaign, Trump assured Ailes, with a far more powerful brand and untold opportunities.  “This is bigger than I ever dreamed of,” he told Ailes in a conversation a week before the election. “I don’t think about losing because it isn’t losing. We’ve totally won.” What’s more, he was already laying down his public response to losing the election: It was stolen!

Donald Trump and his tiny band of campaign  warriors were ready to lose with fire and fury. They were not ready to win.

* * *


In politics somebody has to lose, but invariably everybody thinks they can win. And you probably can’t win unless you believe that you will win—except in the Trump campaign.

The leitmotif for Trump about his own campaign was how crappy it was and how everybody involved in it was a loser. He was equally convinced that the Clinton people were brilliant winners—“They’ve got the best and we’ve got the worst,” he frequently said. Time spent with Trump on the campaign plane was often an epic dissing experience: everybody around him was an idiot.

Corey  Lewandowski, who  served  as  Trump’s  first  more  or  less  official campaign manager, was often berated by the candidate. For months Trump called him “the worst,” and in June 2016 he was finally fired. Ever after, Trump proclaimed his campaign doomed without Lewandowski. “We’re all losers,” he would say. “All our guys are terrible, nobody knows what they’re doing. . . . Wish Corey was back.” Trump quickly soured on his second campaign manager, Paul Manafort, as well.

By August, trailing Clinton by 12 to 17 points and facing a daily firestorm of eviscerating  press,  Trump  couldn’t  conjure  even  a  far-fetched  scenario  for achieving  an electoral  victory.  At this dire moment,  Trump in some essential sense sold his losing campaign.  The right-wing billionaire  Bob Mercer, a Ted Cruz  backer,  had  shifted  his  support  to  Trump  with  a  $5  million  infusion. Believing the campaign was cratering, Mercer and his daughter Rebekah took a helicopter  from  their  Long  Island  estate  out to a scheduled  fundraiser—with other  potential  donors  bailing  by  the  second—at  New  York  Jets  owner  and Johnson & Johnson heir Woody Johnson’s summer house in the Hamptons.

Trump had no real relationship with either father or daughter. He’d had only a few  conversations  with  Bob  Mercer,  who  mostly  talked  in  monosyllables; Rebekah Mercer’s entire history with Trump consisted of a selfie taken with him at Trump Tower. But when the Mercers presented their plan to take over the campaign  and install  their lieutenants,  Steve  Bannon  and Kellyanne  Conway, Trump didn’t resist. He only expressed vast incomprehension about why anyone would want to do that. “This thing,” he told the Mercers, “is so fucked up.”

By every meaningful indicator, something greater than even a sense of doom shadowed what Steve Bannon called “the broke-dick campaign”—a sense of structural impossibility.

The candidate who billed himself as a billionaire—ten  times over—refused even to invest his own money in it. Bannon told Jared Kushner—who,  when Bannon signed on to the campaign, had been off with his wife on a holiday in Croatia  with  Trump  enemy  David  Geffen—that,   after  the  first  debate  in September,  they  would  need  an  additional  $50  million  to  cover  them  until election day.

“No way we’ll get fifty million unless we can guarantee him victory,” said a clear-eyed Kushner.

“Twenty-five million?” prodded Bannon.

“If we can say victory is more than likely.”

In the end, the best Trump would do is loan the campaign $10 million, provided he got it back as soon as they could raise other money. (Steve Mnuchin, then the campaign’s finance chairman, came to collect the loan with the wire instructions ready to go, so Trump couldn’t conveniently forget to send the money.)

There was in fact no real campaign because there was no real organization, or at  best  only  a  uniquely  dysfunctional  one.  Roger  Stone,  the  early  de  facto campaign  manager,  quit  or  was  fired  by  Trump—with  each  man  publicly claiming he had slapped down the other. Sam Nunberg, a Trump aide who had worked for Stone, was noisily ousted by Lewandowski, and then Trump exponentially increased the public dirty-clothes-washing by suing Nunberg. Lewandowski  and Hope  Hicks,  the PR aide  put on the campaign  by Ivanka Trump, had an affair that ended in a public fight on the street—an incident cited by Nunberg in his response to Trump’s suit. The campaign, on its face, was not designed to win anything.

Even as Trump eliminated the sixteen other Republican candidates, however far-fetched that might have seemed, it did not make the ultimate goal of winning the presidency any less preposterous. And  if,  during  the  fall,  winning  seemed  slightly  more  plausible,   that evaporated with the Billy Bush affair. “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful— I just start kissing them,” Trump told the NBC host Billy Bush on an open mic, amid the ongoing national debate about sexual harassment. “It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star they let you do it. You can do anything. . . . Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.”

It was an operatic unraveling. So mortifying was this development that when Reince Priebus, the RNC head, was called to New York from Washington for an emergency  meeting at Trump Tower, he couldn’t bring himself to leave Penn Station. It took two hours for the Trump team to coax him across town.

“Bro,” said a desperate Bannon, cajoling Priebus on the phone, “I may never see you again after today, but you gotta come to this building and you gotta walk through the front door.”

* * *

The silver lining of the ignominy Melania Trump had to endure after the Billy Bush tape was that now there was no way her husband could become president.

Donald Trump’s marriage was perplexing to almost everybody around him— or it was, anyway, for those without private jets and many homes. He and Melania spent relatively little time together. They could go  days at  a  time without contact, even when they were both in Trump Tower. Often she did not know where he was, or take much notice of that fact. Her husband movedbetween residences as he would move between rooms. Along with knowing little about  his  whereabouts,  she  knew  little  about  his  business,  and  took  at  best modest interest in it. An absentee father for his first four children, Trump was even more absent for his fifth, Barron, his son with Melania. Now on his third marriage, he told friends he thought he had finally perfected the art: live and let live—“Do your own thing.”

He was a notorious womanizer, and during the campaign became possibly the world’s most famous masher. While nobody would ever say Trump was sensitive when it came to women, he had many views about how to get along with them, including a theory he discussed with friends about how the more years between an older man and a younger woman, the less the younger woman took an older man’s cheating personally.

Still, the notion that this was a marriage in name only was far from true. He spoke of Melania  frequently  when she wasn’t there. He admired  her looks— often, awkwardly  for her, in the presence  of others.  She was, he told people proudly and without irony, a “trophy wife.” And while he may not have quite shared his life with her, he gladly shared the spoils of it. “A happy wife is a happy life,” he said, echoing a popular rich-man truism.

He also sought Melania’s approval. (He sought the approval of all the women around him, who were wise to give it.) In 2014, when he first seriously began to consider running for president, Melania was one of the few who thought it was possible he could win. It was a punch line for his daughter, Ivanka, who had carefully distanced herself from the campaign. With a never-too-hidden distaste for her stepmother,  Ivanka would say to friends: All you have to know about Melania is that she thinks if he runs he’ll certainly win.

But  the  prospect of  her  husband’s actually becoming president was,  for Melania, a horrifying one. She believed it would destroy her carefully sheltered life—one sheltered, not inconsiderably, from the extended Trump family—which was almost entirely focused on her young son.

Don’t put the cart before the horse, her amused husband said, even as he spent every day on the campaign trail, dominating the news. But her terror and torment mounted.

There was a whisper campaign about her, cruel and comical in its insinuations, going on in Manhattan, which friends told her about. Her modelingcareer  was under close scrutiny.  In Slovenia,  where  she grew up, a celebrity magazine,  Suzy,  put  the  rumors  about  her  into  print  after  Trump  got  the nomination. Then, with a sickening taste of what might be ahead, the Daily Mail blew the story across the world.

The New York Post got its hands on outtakes from a nude photo shoot that Melania  had done early in her modeling  career—a  leak that everybody  other than Melania assumed could be traced back to Trump himself.

Inconsolable, she confronted her husband. Is this the future? She told him she wouldn’t be able to take it.

Trump responded in his fashion—We’ll  sue!—and  set her up with lawyers who successfully did just that. But he was unaccustomedly  contrite, too. Just a little longer, he told her. It would all be over in November. He offered his wife a solemn guarantee: there was simply no way he would win. And even for a chronically—he would say helplessly—unfaithful husband, this was one promise to his wife that he seemed sure to keep.

* * *


The Trump campaign had, perhaps less than inadvertently, replicated the scheme from Mel Brooks’s The Producers. In that classic, Brooks’s larcenous and dopey heroes, Max Bialystock and Leo Bloom, set out to sell more than 100 percent of the ownership stakes in the Broadway show they are producing. Since they will be found out only if the show is a hit, everything about the show is premised on its being a flop. Accordingly, they create a show so outlandish that it actually succeeds, thus dooming our heroes.

Winning presidential candidates—driven by hubris or narcissism or a preternatural sense of destiny—have, more than likely, spent a substantial part of their careers, if not their lives from adolescence, preparing for the role. They rise up the ladder of elected offices. They perfect a public face. They manically network, since success in politics is largely about who your allies are. They cram. (Even in the case of an uninterested George W. Bush, he relied on his father’s cronies to cram for him.) And they clean up after themselves—or, at least, take great care to cover up. They prepare themselves to win and to govern.

The Trump calculation, quite a conscious one, was different. The candidate and  his  top  lieutenants  believed  they  could  get  all  the  benefits  of  almostbecoming president without having to change their behavior or their fundamental worldview one whit: we don’t have to be anything but who and what we are, because of course we won’t win.

Many candidates for president have made a virtue of being Washington outsiders; in practice, this strategy merely favors governors over senators. Every serious candidate, no matter how much he or she disses Washington, relies on Beltway insiders for counsel and support. But with Trump, hardly a person in his innermost circle had ever worked in politics at the national level—his  closest advisers had not worked in politics at all. Throughout his life, Trump had few close friends of any kind, but when he began his campaign for president he had almost no friends in politics. The only two actual politicians with whom Trump was close were Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie, and both men were in their own way peculiar and isolated. And to say that he knew nothing  - nothing at all - about the basic intellectual foundations of the job was a comic understatement.

Early  in  the  campaign,  in  a  Producers-worthy  scene,  Sam Nunberg was sent to explain the Constitution to the candidate: “I got as far as the Fourth Amendment before his finger is pulling down on his lip and his eyes are rolling back in his head.”

Almost everybody on the Trump team came with the kind of messy conflicts bound  to  bite  a  president  or  his  staff.  Mike  Flynn,  Trump’s  future  National Security  Advisor,  who  became  Trump’s  opening  act  at  campaign  rallies  and whom  Trump  loved  to hear  complain  about  the  CIA  and  the  haplessness  of American spies, had been told by his friends that it had not been a good idea to take $45,000 from the Russians for a speech. “Well, it would only be a problem if we won,” he assured them, knowing that it would therefore not be a problem.

Paul Manafort, the international lobbyist and political operative who Trump

retained to run his campaign after Lewandowski was fired—and who agreed not to take a fee, amping up questions of quid pro quo—had spent thirty years representing dictators and corrupt despots, amassing millions of dollars in a money trail that had long caught the eye of U.S. investigators. What’s more, when he joined the campaign, he was being pursued, his every financial step documented, by the billionaire Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, who claimed he stole $17 million from him in a crooked real estate scam.

For quite obvious reasons, no president before Trump and few politicians

ever have come out of the real estate business: a lightly regulated market, based on  substantial  debt  with  exposure  to  frequent  market  fluctuations,  it  often depends on government favor, and is a preferred exchange currency for problem cash—money  laundering.  Trump’s  son-in-law  Jared  Kushner,  Jared’s  father Charlie,  Trump’s  sons Don Jr. and Eric, and his daughter  Ivanka,  as well as Trump  himself,  all supported  their  business  enterprises  to a greater  or lesser extent working in the dubious limbo of international  free cash flow and gray money. Charlie Kushner, to whose real estate business interests Trump’s son-in- law and most important aide was wholly tied, had already spent time in a federal prison   for  tax  evasion,   witness   tampering,   and  making   illegal   campaign donations.

Modern politicians and their staffs perform their most consequential piece of opposition research on themselves. If the Trump team had vetted their candidate, they would  have reasonably  concluded  that heightened  ethical  scrutiny  could easily  put them  in jeopardy.  But  Trump  pointedly  performed  no such  effort. Roger Stone, Trump’s longtime political adviser, explained to Steve Bannon that Trump’s psychic makeup made it impossible for him to take such a close look at himself. Nor could he tolerate knowing that somebody else would then know a lot about him—and therefore have something over him. And anyway, why take such a close and potentially threatening look, because what were the chances of winning?

Not only did Trump disregard the potential conflicts of his business deals and real  estate  holdings,  he  audaciously  refused  to  release  his  tax  returns.  Why should he if he wasn’t going to win? What’s more, Trump refused to spend any time considering, however hypothetically, transition matters, saying it was “bad luck”—but really meaning it was a waste of time. Nor would he even remotely contemplate the issue of his holdings and conflicts.

He wasn’t going to win! Or losing was winning.

Trump would be the most famous man in the world—a martyr to crooked Hillary Clinton.
His   daughter   Ivanka   and   son-in-law   Jared   would   have   transformed themselves from relatively obscure rich kids into international celebrities and brand ambassadors.

Steve Bannon would become the de facto head of the Tea Party movement. Kellyanne Conway would be a cable news star.

Reince Priebus and Katie Walsh would get their Republican Party back. Melania Trump could return to inconspicuously lunching.

That  was  the  trouble-free  outcome  they  awaited  on  November  8,  2016. Losing would work out for everybody.

Shortly after eight o’clock that evening, when the unexpected trend—Trump might actually win—seemed confirmed, Don Jr. told a friend that his father, or DJT, as he called  him, looked  as if he had seen a ghost.  Melania,  to whom Donald Trump had made his solemn guarantee, was in tears—and not of joy.

There was, in the space of little more than an hour, in Steve Bannon’s not unamused observation, a befuddled Trump morphing into a disbelieving Trump and  then  into  a  quite  horrified  Trump.  But  still  to  come  was  the  final transformation:  suddenly,  Donald Trump became a man who believed  that he deserved  to be and was wholly  capable  of being the president  of the United States.

The end of free sample pages

 

Source: Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House Hardcover by Michael Wolff (5 Jan 2018)

Saturday, January 6, 2018

Prologue: Ailes And Bannon

Fire And Fury

Previous Post > Author's Note

The evening began at six-thirty, but Steve Bannon, suddenly among the world’s  most  powerful  men  and  now  less  and  less  mindful  of  time constraints, was late.

Bannon  had  promised  to  come  to  this  small  dinner  arranged  by  mutual friends in a Greenwich Village town house to see Roger Ailes, the former head of Fox News and the most significant figure in right-wing media and Bannon’s sometime mentor. The next day, January 4, 2017—little  more than two weeks before the inauguration of his friend Donald Trump as the forty-fifth president— Ailes would be heading to Palm Beach, into a forced, but he hoped temporary, retirement.

Snow was threatening,  and for a while the dinner appeared  doubtful.  The seventy-six-year-old  Ailes,  with a long history  of leg and hip problems,  was barely  walking,  and,  coming  in to Manhattan  with  his  wife  Beth  from  their upstate home on the Hudson, was wary of slippery streets. But Ailes was eager to see Bannon. Bannon’s aide, Alexandra Preate, kept texting steady updates on Bannon’s progress extracting himself from Trump Tower.

As the small group waited for Bannon, it was Ailes’s evening. Quite as dumbfounded by his old friend Donald Trump’s victory as most everyone else, Ailes provided the gathering with something of a mini-seminar on the randomness and absurdities of politics. Before launching Fox News in 1996, Ailes had been, for thirty years, among the leading political operatives in the Republican Party. As surprised as he was by this election, he could yet make a case for a straight line from Nixon to Trump. He just wasn’t sure, he said, that Trump  himself,  at  various  times  a  Republican,  Independent,  and  Democrat, could make the case. Still, he thought he knew Trump as well as anyone did and was eager to offer his help. He was also eager to get back into the right-wing media game, and he energetically described some of the possibilities for coming up with the billion  or so dollars  he thought  he would  need  for a new cable network.

Both  men,  Ailes  and  Bannon,  fancied  themselves  particular  students  of history, both autodidacts  partial to universal field theories. They saw this in a charismatic sense—they had a personal relationship with history, as well as with Donald Trump.

Now, however reluctantly, Ailes understood that, at least for the moment, he was passing the right-wing torch to Bannon. It was a torch that burned bright with ironies. Ailes’s Fox News, with its $1.5 billion in annual profits, had dominated Republican politics for two decades. Now Bannon’s Breitbart News, with its mere $1.5 million in annual profits, was claiming that role. For thirty years, Ailes—until recently the single most powerful person in conservative politics—had humored and tolerated Donald Trump, but in the end Bannon and Breitbart had elected him.

Six months before, when a Trump victory still seemed out of the realm of the possible, Ailes, accused of sexual harassment, was cashiered from Fox News in a  move  engineered  by  the  liberal  sons  of  conservative  eighty-five-year-old Rupert  Murdoch,  the  controlling  shareholder   of  Fox  News  and  the  most powerful media owner of the age. Ailes’s downfall was cause for much liberal celebration: the greatest conservative bugbear in modern politics had been felled by the new  social  norm.  Then  Trump,  hardly  three  months  later,  accused  of vastly more louche and abusive behavior, was elected president.

 * * *
Ailes enjoyed many things about Trump: his salesmanship, his showmanship, his gossip. He admired Trump’s sixth sense for the public marketplace—or at least the relentlessness and indefatigability of his ceaseless attempts to win it over. He liked Trump’s game. He liked Trump’s impact and his shamelessness. “He just keeps going,” Ailes had marveled to a friend after the first debate with Hillary Clinton. “You hit Donald along the head, and he keeps going. He doesn’t even know he’s been hit.”

But Ailes was convinced  that Trump had no political  beliefs or backbone. The fact that Trump had become the ultimate  avatar of Fox’s angry common man was another sign that we were living in an upside-down world. The joke was on somebody—and Ailes thought it might be on him.

Still, Ailes had been observing politicians for decades, and in his long career he had witnessed just about every type and style and oddity and confection and cravenness and mania. Operatives like himself—and now, like Bannon—worked with all kinds. It was the ultimate symbiotic and codependent relationship. Politicians were front men in a complex organizational effort. Operatives knew the game, and so did most candidates  and officeholders.  But Ailes was pretty sure Trump did not. Trump was undisciplined—he had no capacity for any game plan. He could not be a part of any organization, nor was he likely to subscribe to any program or principle. In Ailes’s view, he was “a rebel without a cause.” He was simply “Donald”—as though nothing more need be said.

In early August,  less than a month after Ailes had been ousted  from Fox News, Trump asked his old friend to take over the management of his calamitous campaign. Ailes, knowing Trump’s disinclination to take advice, or even listen to it, turned him down. This was the job Bannon took a week later.

After Trump’s victory, Ailes seemed to balance regret that he had not seized the chance to run his friend’s campaign with incredulity that Trump’s offer had turned  out  to  be  the  ultimate   opportunity.   Trump’s  rise  to  power,  Ailes understood,  was  the  improbable  triumph  of  many  things  that  Ailes  and  Fox News represented. After all, Ailes was perhaps the person most responsible for unleashing the angry-man currents of Trump’s victory: he had invented the right- wing media that delighted in the Trump character.

Ailes, who was a member of the close circle of friends and advisers Trump

frequently called, found himself hoping he would get more time with the new president once he and Beth moved to Palm Beach; he knew Trump planned to make regular trips to Mar-a-Lago, down the road from Ailes’s new home. Still, though Ailes was well aware that in politics, winning changes everything—the winner is the winner—he couldn’t quite get his head around the improbable and bizarre fact that his friend Donald Trump was now president of the United States.

 * * *
At nine-thirty, three hours late, a good part of the dinner already eaten, Bannon finally arrived. Wearing a disheveled blazer, his signature pairing of two shirts, and military fatigues, the unshaven, overweight sixty-three-year-old  joined the other  guests  at  the  table  and  immediately  took  control  of  the  conversation. Pushing a proffered glass of wine away—“I don’t drink”—he dived into a live commentary, an urgent download of information about the world he was about to take over.

“We’re going to flood the zone so we have every cabinet member for the next seven days through their confirmation  hearings,”  he said of the business-and- military 1950s-type cabinet choices. “Tillerson is two days, Session is two days, Mattis is two days. . . .”

Bannon veered from “Mad Dog” Mattis—the retired four-star general whom Trump  had nominated  as secretary  of defense—to  a long  riff on torture,  the surprising liberalism of generals, and the stupidity of the civilian-military bureaucracy.  Then it was on to the looming appointment of Michael Flynn—a favorite Trump general who’d been the opening act at many Trump rallies—as the National Security Advisor.

“He’s fine. He’s not Jim Mattis and he’s not John Kelly . . . but he’s fine. He just needs the right staff around him.” Still, Bannon averred: “When you take out all the never-Trump guys who signed all those letters and all the neocons who got us in all these wars . . . it’s not a deep bench.”

Bannon said he’d tried to push John Bolton, the famously hawkish diplomat, for the job as National Security Advisor. Bolton was an Ailes favorite, too.

“He’s a bomb thrower,” said Ailes. “And a strange little fucker. But you need him. Who else is good on Israel? Flynn is a little nutty on Iran. Tillerson”—the secretary of state designate—“just knows oil.”

“Bolton’s mustache is a problem,” snorted Bannon. “Trump doesn’t think he looks the part. You know Bolton is an acquired taste.”

“Well, rumors were that he got in trouble because he got in a fight in a hotel one night and chased some woman.”

“If I told Trump that, he might have the job.”

* * *

Bannon was curiously able to embrace Trump while at the same time suggesting he did not take him entirely seriously. He had first met Trump, the on-again off- again presidential candidate, in 2010; at a meeting in Trump Tower, Bannon had proposed to Trump that he spend half a million dollars backing Tea Party-style candidates  as  a  way  to  further  his  presidential  ambitions.  Bannon  left  the meeting figuring that Trump would never cough up that kind of dough. He just wasn’t  a  serious  player.  Between  that  first  encounter  and  mid-August  2016, when he took over the Trump campaign, Bannon, beyond a few interviews he had done with Trump for his Breitbart  radio show, was pretty sure he hadn’t spent more than ten minutes in one-on-one conversation with Trump.

But now Bannon’s  Zeitgeist  moment had arrived. Everywhere  there was a sudden sense of  global self-doubt. Brexit in  the  UK,  waves of  immigrants arriving on Europe’s angry shores, the disenfranchisement  of the workingman, the specter of more financial meltdown, Bernie Sanders and his liberal revanchism—everywhere  was backlash. Even the most dedicated exponents of globalism were hesitating. Bannon believed that great numbers of people were suddenly receptive  to a new message:  the world needs borders—or  the world should return to a time when it had borders. When America was great. Trump had become the platform for that message.

By that  January  evening,  Bannon  had been  immersed  in Donald  Trump’s world  for  almost  five  months.  And  though  he  had  accumulated  a  sizable catalogue of Trump’s peculiarities,  and cause enough for possible alarm about the unpredictability of his boss and his views, that did not detract from Trump’s extraordinary,  charismatic  appeal  to the right-wing,  Tea Party,  Internet  meme base, and now, in victory, from the opportunity he was giving Steve Bannon.

* * *
“Does he get it?” asked Ailes suddenly, pausing and looking intently at Bannon.

He meant did Trump get it. This seemed to be a question about the right-wing agenda: Did the playboy billionaire really get the workingman populist cause? But it was possibly a point-blank question about the nature of power itself. Did Trump get where history had put him?
Bannon took a sip of water. “He gets it,” said Bannon, after hesitating for perhaps a beat too long. “Or he gets what he gets.”

With a sideways look, Ailes continued to stare him down, as though waiting for Bannon to show more of his cards.

“Really,”  Bannon  said.  “He’s  on the program.  It’s his program.”  Pivoting from  Trump  himself,  Bannon  plunged  on with  the Trump  agenda.  “Day  one we’re moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.  Netanyahu’s  all in. Sheldon”— Sheldon  Adelson,  the casino  billionaire,  far-right  Israel  defender,  and Trump supporter—“is all in. We know where we’re heading on this.”

“Does Donald know?” asked a skeptical Ailes.

Bannon smiled—as though almost with a wink—and continued:

“Let Jordan take the West Bank, let Egypt take Gaza. Let them deal with it. Or sink trying. The Saudis are on the brink, Egyptians are on the brink, all scared to death of Persia . . . Yemen, Sinai, Libya . . . this thing is bad. . . . That’s why Russia is so key. . . . Is Russia that bad? They’re bad guys. But the world is full of bad guys.”

Bannon offered all this with something like ebullience—a man remaking the world.

“But it’s good to know the bad guys are the bad guys,” said Ailes, pushing Bannon. “Donald may not know.”

The real enemy, said an on-point Bannon, careful not to defend Trump too much or to dis him at all, was China. China was the first front in a new cold war. And it had all been misunderstood  in the Obama years—what  we thought we understood we didn’t understand at all. That was the failure of American intelligence. “I think Comey is a third-rate guy. I think Brennan is a second-rate guy,” Bannon said, dismissing the FBI director and the CIA director.

“The White House right now is like Johnson’s White House in 1968. Susan Rice”—Obama’s National Security Advisor—“is running the campaign against ISIS as a National Security Advisor. They’re picking the targets, she’s picking the drone strikes. I mean, they’re running the war with just as much effectiveness as Johnson in sixty-eight. The Pentagon is totally disengaged from the whole thing. Intel services are disengaged from the whole thing. The media has let Obama off the hook. Take the ideology away from it, this is complete amateur hour. I don’t know what Obama does. Nobody on Capitol Hill knows him, no business guys know him—what has he accomplished, what does he do?”

“Where’s Donald on this?” asked Ailes, now with the clear implication that Bannon was far out ahead of his benefactor. “He’s totally on board.”

“Focused?” “He buys it.”

“I wouldn’t give Donald too much to think about,” said an amused Ailes. Bannon snorted. “Too much, too little—doesn’t necessarily change things.”

* * *

“What has he gotten himself into with the Russians?” pressed Ailes.

“Mostly,” said Bannon, “he went to Russia and he thought he was going to meet Putin. But Putin couldn’t give a shit about him. So he’s kept trying.”

“He’s Donald,” said Ailes.

“It’s a magnificent thing,” said Bannon, who had taken to regarding Trump as something like a natural wonder, beyond explanation.

Again,  as  though  setting  the  issue  of  Trump  aside—merely  a  large  and peculiar presence to both be thankful for and to have to abide—Bannon, in the role he had conceived for himself, the auteur of the Trump presidency, charged forward:

“China’s everything. Nothing else matters. We don’t get China right, we don’t get  anything  right.  This  whole  thing  is  very  simple.  China  is  where  Nazi Germany  was in 1929 to 1930. The Chinese,  like the Germans,  are the most rational  people  in  the  world,  until  they’re  not.  And  they’re  gonna  flip  like Germany in the thirties. You’re going to have a hypernationalist state, and once that happens you can’t put the genie back in the bottle.”

“Donald might not be Nixon in China,” said Ailes, deadpan, suggesting that for Trump to seize the mantle of global transformation might strain credulity.

Bannon  smiled.  “Bannon  in   China,”  he   said,  with  both  remarkable grandiosity and wry self-deprecation.

“How’s the kid?” asked Ailes, referring to Trump’s son-in-law and paramount political adviser, thirty-six-year-old Jared Kushner.

“He’s my partner,” said Bannon, his tone suggesting that if he felt otherwise, he was nevertheless determined to stay on message.

“Really?” said a dubious Ailes. “He’s on the team.”

“He’s had lot of lunches with Rupert.”

“In fact,”  said  Bannon,  “I could  use  your  help  here.”  Bannon  then  spent several minutes trying to recruit Ailes to help kneecap Murdoch. Ailes, since his ouster from Fox, had become only more bitter towards Murdoch. Now Murdoch was frequently jawboning the president-elect and encouraging him toward establishment  moderation—all  a strange inversion in the ever-stranger currents of American  conservatism.  Bannon wanted Ailes to suggest to Trump, a man whose  many  neuroses  included  a  horror  of  forgetfulness   or  senility,  that Murdoch might be losing it.

“I’ll call him,” said Ailes. “But Trump would jump through hoops for Rupert. Like for Putin. Sucks up and shits down. I just worry about who’s jerking whose chain.”

The older right-wing media wizard and the younger (though not by all that much) continued on to the other guests’ satisfaction until twelve-thirty, the older trying  to see through  to the new national  enigma  that was Trump—although Ailes would say that in fact Trump’s behavior  was ever predictable—and  the younger seemingly determined not to spoil his own moment of destiny.
“Donald Trump has got it. He’s Trump, but he’s got it. Trump is Trump,” affirmed Bannon.

“Yeah, he’s Trump,” said Ailes, with something like incredulity.

Source: Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House Hardcover by Michael Wolff (5 Jan 2018)

Next Post > Chapter 1 - Election Day

Friday, January 5, 2018

Author's Note

Fire And Fury


The reason to write this book could not be more obvious. With the inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20, 2017, the United States entered the eye of the most   extraordinary   political   storm   since   at  least   Watergate.   As  the  day approached,  I  set  out  to  tell  this  story  in  as  contemporaneous  a  fashion  as possible, and to try to see life in the Trump White House through the eyes of the people closest to it.

This was originally conceived as an account of the Trump administration’s first  hundred  days,  that  most  traditional  marker  of  a  presidency.  But  events barreled on without natural pause for more than two hundred days, the curtain coming down on the first act of Trump’s presidency only with the appointment of retired general John Kelly as the chief of staff in late July and the exit of chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon three weeks later.

The events I’ve described in these pages are based on conversations that took place over a period of eighteen months with the president, with most members of his senior staff—some of whom talked to me dozens of times—and with many people  who they in turn spoke to. The first interview  occurred  well before  I could have imagined a Trump White House, much less a book about it, in late May 2016 at Trump’s home in Beverly Hills—the then candidate polishing off a pint of Häagen-Dazs vanilla as he happily and idly opined about a range of topics while his aides, Hope Hicks, Corey Lewandowski, and Jared Kushner, went in and out of the room. Conversations with members of the campaign’s team continued through the Republican Convention in Cleveland, when it was still hardly possible to conceive of Trump’s election. They moved on to Trump Tower with a voluble Steve Bannon—before the election, when he still seemed like an entertaining oddity, and later, after the election, when he seemed like a miracle worker.

Shortly after January 20, I took up something like a semipermanent seat on a couch in the West Wing. Since then I have conducted more than two hundred interviews.

While  the  Trump  administration  has  made  hostility  to the  press  a virtual policy, it has also been more open to the media than any White House in recent memory. In the beginning, I sought a level of formal access to this White House, something  of a fly-on-the-wall  status.  The  president  himself  encouraged  this idea. But, given the many fiefdoms in the Trump White House that came into open conflict  from the first days of the administration,  there  seemed  no one person able to make this happen. Equally, there was no one to say “Go away.” Hence I became more a constant interloper than an invited guest—something quite close to an actual fly on the wall—having  accepted no rules nor having made any promises about what I might or might not write.

Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. Those conflicts,  and  that  looseness  with  the  truth,  if  not  with  reality  itself,  are  an elemental  thread  of  the  book.  Sometimes  I  have  let  the  players  offer  their versions, in turn allowing the reader to judge them. In other instances I have, through  a consistency  in accounts  and through  sources  I have come to trust, settled on a version of events I believe to be true.

Some of my sources spoke to me on so-called deep background, a convention of contemporary  political  books that allows  for a disembodied  description  of events provided by an unnamed witness to them. I have also relied on off-the- record interviews, allowing a source to provide a direct quote with the understanding that it was not for attribution. Other sources spoke to me with the understanding that the material in the interviews would not become public until the book came out. Finally, some sources spoke forthrightly on the record.

At the same time, it is worth noting some of the journalistic conundrums that I faced when dealing with the Trump administration, many of them the result of the White House’s absence of official procedures and the lack of experience of its principals. These challenges have included dealing with off-the-record or deep-background material that was later casually put on the record; sources who provided  accounts  in  confidence  and  subsequently  shared  them  widely,  as though liberated  by their first utterances;  a frequent inattention  to setting any parameters on the use of a conversation; a source’s views being so well known and widely shared that it would be risible not to credit them; and the almost samizdat sharing, or gobsmacked retelling, of otherwise private and deep- background conversations. And everywhere in this story is the president’s own constant, tireless, and uncontrolled voice, public and private, shared by others on a daily basis, sometimes virtually as he utters it.

For whatever reason, almost everyone I contacted—senior  members of the White House staff as well as dedicated observers of it—shared large amounts of time with me and went to great effort to help shed light on the unique nature of life inside the Trump White House. In the end, what I witnessed, and what this book is about, is a group of people who have struggled, each in their own way, to come to terms with the meaning of working for Donald Trump.

I owe them an enormous debt.

Source: Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House Hardcover by Michael Wolff (5 Jan 2018)

Next Post > Prologue: Ailes And Bannon